Duane, I'm sure you can figure it out. You need to pay attention to everything. I would suggest that you look at a well that has been in production for a few years, then look at the relevant wellfile of yours and play the what's missing game. Look for the completion report, telling how many frack stages, millions of pounds of propant used and whether it was a "sand frack" or a better, more expensive, completion using ceramic propant.
If you had been watching the GIS server map you could have seen the rig symbol then watched it move from well to well, watched it leave and watched for it's return to drill to total depth. The drawing of proposed tank batteries may not be accurate either, the reality may be less or more.
After production begins, I would be looking for the operator to ask for permission to comingle production from multiple wells in the production tanks. Production will likely show up first under general statistics as sales of oil are not confidential although it will not tell you how many days the well produced to gemerate the production sold.
For me searching general statistics is a pain because the wells are grouped by fields but it just takes patience to find your field and your wells name. General statistics usually runs about 6 weeks behind so I would wait a month or two before searching.
I think it's great you got the subscription and believe that you will be very satisfied with it's value, once you become more familliar with it's use.
158-92-30, the dry well didn't get a good start being 8 degrees off verttcal, when this was discovered they plugged back and attempted it again and it was still off, tried again with the same result even when they plugged back all the way to the conductor casing and it sounds to me like they have abandoned that hole for good having only reched a depth of a little over 2,200 feet.
Four of the confidential wells spud are classed in the Enget Lake field which I presume means they will be drilled in a westerly direction into 158-93-25/26.
Two of the producing wells in the 158-92-30/29 spacing are not visible on the GIS map and you might phone the NDICO&G Division and bring it to their attention. The wells appear to be good to somewhat better than good aside from the abortive attempt that was P/A.
I would consider it unlikely but there could be some small chance that spudded well #26900 could be headed north in the absence of evidence that it will be heading east. The naming convention used by Oasis doesn't give much in the way of clues.
That was a pleasant half hour but I'm not going to delve deeper. I think you have enough to start fishing. Before long you will know some wells like the back of your hand. Have a great day!