I purchased 220 acres of land of land in Van Buren Co. Arkansas in 2000, 110 acres mineral rights should have went with the surface, according to the deeds. My grantor and I did not discuss mineral rights at point of purchase, it was before a rumor of CNG in this area. My grantor provided me with a fee simple warranty deed, with no prior mineral reservations, upon closing. I was contacted in 2003 by a leasing agent to lease my mineral rights, I advised him at that time I did not know if I owned the minerals because my grantor and I did not discuss. The leasing agent researched, and called me back in a few weeks and advised I owned all 220 acres of minerals, which was incorrect, but I still do own 110 acres of mineral rights by the laws of the federal and state government. I leased them for $25.00 an acre for 10 years, the lease would have expired by now but would be held by production. My land man advised me in 2005 or 2006 the minerals belonged to myself, he worked for a major operator in the area. When I was starting to try to verify, title ownership, I went back and looked at the deeds, from my grantors grantor. He and wife received 110 acres of minerals with the 220 acres of surface. The man and wife then put the minerals into a corporation named Cen Ark, this was in 1994, in 1995, the man and wife sold the surface to my grantor. The man and wife warranted title to the surface as man and wife, with a fee simple deed. A company named Tri Con Construction Inc purchased, in 1995, from the man and wife, and they warranted title as man and wife, in the deeds. I purchased the surface in 2000 with no discussion of minerals with Tri Con. In 11-2004, the man and wife took minerals out of corporation, and put back into their personal names, and since they had warranted title personally, as soon as the deed was recorded the minerals ownership went immediately to the current surface holder, which was myself. Not only did the man and wife do this with my 110 acres of minerals but with over 6000 acres of mineral rights in this county. There also was no reservation of minerals in the deeds from my grantors grantor. The law that applies is after acquired title. In the last 2 sales there are no reservations were in the deeds. The operator determined I owned the minerals and started paying me royalties, and did for approx. 2 years. I had to sue my grantors grantor to gain clear title, he had leased the same minerals to another operator that I had leased to in 2003, but I actually owned no minerals until 11-2004 when the man and wife put the minerals back into personal names. But I did after that time,the operator when I sued the man and wife that they had leased to sued them for breach of warranty, because they had signed a lease with a warranty of minerals title clause in it. That operator also sued me for clouding the title, but the minerals belonged to me by law. I went to a pre trial hearing, and the judge ruled in my favor, that our argument was convincing, and it truly was after acquired title and the mineral rights belonged to myself. Approx 2 weeks later, the judge, I think after he was comprimised, by a major operator allowed some subpoenas to be submitted by my grantors that absolutely had nothing to do with the deeds of record just here say. My attorney told me when I hired him, a operator in this case, was his largest client, and that if I got crossways with them he would have to bow out, but he didnt. We went to trial and it was a staged act all the lawyers knew what was up and my lawyer told me the judge had called him before trial, and also the bankers lawyer had called him that previously was the man and wife’s partner.My 2 key witnesses were not called to the stand. The trial was a complete sham, I knew it at trial. Of course I lost, based upon reformation of the deeds, and that the man and wife had different intent, when they recorded in 2004, or made a mistake. The law has no excuses for ignorance. The law of reformation states that the courts do not have the authority to impose reformation, on a party to the deeds that did not agree as to the contract, which myself and one person before me certainly did not. So reformation was imposed in 2 cases that I know of. I have been asked by the operators why would we care who owns the minerals, I have the answer, the operators had paid the man, wife, and banker lease monies on this 6000 that the operators knew they would not get back, and that the leases these 3 people would be worthless, if the courts awarded minerals to the correct mineral owners, and the operators would have had to release for premium prices, because the public knew at this time what the leases were going for. It would have cost the operators huge money, for the minerals to go to myself and the other holders of a portion of this 6000 acres, so what they did is bribe the Judge, that was bankrupt 3 years ago. The judge is receiving all kinds of perks from this operator. No elected official in the state would help me, and I think they are all benefitting from these companies stealing rightful owners mineral rights so they benefit personally, as lame duck corrupt politicians. From State senator, governor, attorney general, Judicial Discipline and Disibility Commission, and Arkansas Bar Assn. The federal justice department advised me it was the attorney generals job to look into this, he turned me down 6 or 7 times, so did the governor whose son conveniently has a job by a CNG operator. I appealed to appeallate courts, and the Judge I got just happened to be from West Helena Arkansas, same as my so called judge, a very small town, and both had law offices in that city, some coincidence. My oil and has attorney deliberately did not advise me of the correct steps to take to get my case reviewed by the supreme court. I was corrupted out of my rightful mineral rights in Atkansas, along with a lot of other people that don’t even know they own their mineral rights, as a part of this 6000 acres. Yes the man, wife, and banker knew they had made a fatal mistake by recording the deeds into their personal names in 2004, they tried to sell the 6000 acres of minerals after that date, and had a buyer until the buyer ran title, and it was found out these people no longer owned minerals in this county. I never knew this level of corruption existed, in our state, I do now, and the operators brought it with them, by sheer greed of elected officials, at the expense of their constiuents. This article is of my personal opinion. S
,