Has anyone ever heard of an operator treating one mineral interest owner as a non consenting co-tenant even though that mineral owner actually consented to the same terms as all the other mineral owners? I signed the same lease terms as the rest of my family, but the operator refuses to pay me bonus money ($2,000/acre) and is treating me as non-consenting co-tenant. This same operator suspended my royalties for months but paid the rest of my family. Why would an operator single out one family member (with executive rights) to treat differently? (Texas)
As a residential landlord, I am obligated to treat all of my tenants fairly. Are there some kind of nondiscrimination laws applicable to mineral leases? (e.g. you can’t penalize a royalty owner for asking for information due under the lease)
thank you,
Paula Kothmann Consenting Cotenant treated as a NonConsenting Cotenant