Garfield County, OK - Oil & Gas Discussion archives

Tracy,

You can go to Oklahoma Corp. Comm. site, then go to Well data, new wells at middle of page, then type in the legal only.

That will give you the information you are looking for.

It maybe Mississippi at 6245 and Woodford 6742 if I’m on the right Peach well. Looks like there is a salt water well also.

That is a great map and very helpful for me to visualize everything. Thank you.



Tracy If you want me to walk you through OCC accept my friend request in the upper right hand corner and I will send my #. Good luck.

Tracy,

If you will go to OCC site and get to your well, all those API # is what is filed. Like the first thing is a permit to drill, #2 is Notification of well spud, #3 completion report, #4 cementing report, #5 is survey report. If you are looking for the production records, this may not be filed for several months. Once the production records come on line, you will have to call Junior or Donna at OCC and get the # for whom is buying the oil and gas.

This map might help someone.

ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/OK/tech/gis/Web/County_Base_Maps/4047…

Thanks for the Map Ron!! I found our place rather quickly, right there next to Highway 74. Very cool. Tracy, congrats on your minerals producing so well. I wish you , as well as everyone on here, the best of luck now, and in the future.

Thanks Chad and Ron too! It is an exciting time for mineral owners in this country and I’m thankful that my grandparents and parents had the foresight to hang onto their property and mineral rights. I hope the best for everyone as well…it’s time the “little man” got something for their hard work, common sense, and integrity!

Mr McKenzie, You mentioned today that in Garfield County there are several sections that were active including section 17. We own mineral rights in SE4 of Sec 17 - 20N - 8W How would we find out if or when any horizontal or verticle wells are active or planned close to us? Also, I believe you mentioned there is a paper that contains information that is helpful. What is it and how is it available? Thank you for all your input on this site. Randall

Well in 3-23n-4w tested 1021 BOD & 1327 MCF at 24/64 choke with 300 psi fcp

RM Have been gone will get with you in the morning.

Garfield: M M Energy Inc., Dively No. 62 Well, C NE/4 NW/4 of 24-22N-04W, 180 MCFPD, 10 BOPD, TD 4,810 feet.

Garfield: M M Energy Inc., Belveal No. 49 Well, C W/2 SW/4 NE/4 of 24-22N-04W, 20 BOPD, TD 4,750 feet.

Read more from this Tulsa World article at http://www.tulsaworld.com/business/article.aspx?subjectid=49&ar…

RM Not much new in 20n-8w going on that I could find at Okla corp. comm., the Paper was the Daily Oklahoman which is online . It is under oil & gas in business section.

Garfield: Wicklund Petroleum Corp.; FLB No. 1-14H Well; C SW1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 14-23N-04W; 179 barrels oil per day, 597,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 9,882.

Wicklund Petroleum Corp.; Henderson No. 1-22H Well; E1/2 SE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 22-23N-04W; 128 barrels oil per day, 715,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 9,839.

Garfield: ARP Oklahoma LLC; Odie No. 2-4H Well; SW1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 04-24N-08W; TD 10,681 permit

Permit to drill

Garfield: Plymouth Exploration LLC; Sharon No. 1-10H Well; SW1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SW1/4 (SL) of 10-24N-04W; TD 10,250.

Garfield: Husky Ventures Inc.; Bledsoe No. 1-28H Well; SE1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 28-20N-07W; TD 12,525.

Plymouth Exploration LLC; Linda No. 1-4H Well; SE1/4 SE1/4 SW1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 04-24N-04W; TD 10,500. Permits to drill

Garfield: Plymouth Exploration LLC; Meikle No. 1-9H Well; C SW1/4 SW1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 09-24N-04W; 183 barrels oil per day, 773,000 cu-ft gas per day; TD 10,147.

Permit

Garfield: Limestone Exploration II LLC; Hornet No. 1-6H Well; SW1/4 NW1/4 NW1/4 NE1/4 (SL) of 06-20N-03W; TD 10,664.

Permit

Garfield: Cisco Operating LLC; Tortola No. 16-1H Well; S1/2 S1/2 SE1/4 SE1/4 (SL) of 16-24N-05W; TD 10,917.

Ron,

Have you heard anything regarding a well being drilled in section 12-21N-3W, Garfield. I think Limestone is drilling it. Haven’t seen any report on it.