Reeves County, TX - Oil & Gas Discussion archives

Glenda, try these links that should take you to plats showing the proposed wells in the Lee and Grant surveys. On the one for the Lee lease the horizontal legs for two of the wells are marked “as drilled”, so something should be showing up on their completion.

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/dpimages/img/3700000-3799999//PR0003…

http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/dpimages/img/3800000-3899999//PR0003…

What about Sec 265 Blk 13 H&GN compared to Sec 206 and 271?

Can I expect to get similar bonus offers for all these three areas?

Lynn,

I’m negotiating a lease in Section 265. I’m being told this is for Colgate Operating. Whose drilling schedule is 265 on for this year?

Mike

TennisDaze,

It may be Lot 9, I was told Block 9. I think there are multiple “blocks” in this section because of the way the section was divided in the early 1900’s and the way it came out of bankruptcy around 1913. I understand the confusion, but from what I understand about this section it has been confusing for over 100 years. But the minerals are in H&GN Survey, Block 13, Section 265.

Mike

My fullest appreciation to all that has responded to my questions, Ole Lawrence, TennisDaze and Charles and others. I surely do appreciate all the information you all have given me. I am so very hesitant about the leasing, just frightened.

Also, should I contact the company that has the lease on the land for drilling of oil and gas? Could there be a problem with where the water wells are place in regards to where the oil wells to be placed?

Thank you all for your help.

Louise

Dusty, I tried my best to use the link you gave me. It’s just too complicated for me. Our property is in CO Abst 3697 Twsp Bk56 Sect 36 QQ NW and 36; also Abst 3699 30,30,30. All I can determine from the map is it’s in 8 (whatever that refers to)

Also two wells have been drilled in the Phantom Wolfcamp : #410BH and #49AH. A PERMIT WAS ISSUED in January or February FOR 1/12 HORIZONTAL. Can you tell me anything from this info?

Glenda, below is RRC’s map of your area with Sec. 30 & 36 outlined in red. Apache calls Sec. 30 the Lee lease and 36 the Grant lease.

I think those wells you asked about are Apache Grant #410BH and #409AH (not 49). RRC approved both those permits on 1/12/18 but so far Apache hasn’t reported a spud date or filed completion reports with RRC for those two wells or any of the other 15 that Apache has gotten permits for on those two leases. Permits for some of those other wells were approved last August so it’s possible some have been drilled but nothing has been filed yet.

Hope this helps.

Brenda,

my cousins have received bonus amounts of 10k to 12k per acre for lease extensions within Section 265 Block 13.

Section 265 is on this year drilling schedule. Things are moving.

As Lawrence has said, things are about to pop!

Get a lawyer to go over your lease. This is a multilevel oil and gas field.

I will do that. Thanks again…

I want to know if there is any activity in Sec 206 Blk 13 H&GN RR Survey

or Sec 271 Blk 13 H&GN RR Survey areas. Anyone know if there are wells on or close to these areas in Reeves County?

Brenda, my SWD is near there in Blk 13, Sec 182 and Primexx, Noble Permian, Cimerex, Centenial, Oxy, Brigham, Diamondback, Parsley, and even Apache are building lease produced water pipeline networks to transport produced water to disposal all over that area. You can expect

increased drilling activity in that area…and emphasis on quad or octal

clusters of horizontal wells on each pad. Look at the Jalapeno quad well of Noble Permian to see the trend.

Yes, you can expect many more bonus offers in that area.

Mike,

Concho Resources.

The entity you are dealing with is probably linked or associated with Concho

but I do not have an overview. Lawrence and others who know the industry may be able to explain how it is all structured and how business is conducted.

Good Luck.

TennisDaze:

Thank You. Will share news with my cousins.

Thanks Lynn and TennisDaze.

I just found out over the weekend that I have mineral interests in Section 265. I’m now wondering what the situation may have been for the last several years about past leasing activity. How this was leased, if at all. This is part of Block 9, H&GN Survey, Block 13, Section 265, Toyah Valley Grape and Alfalfa Company Subdivision.

Mike

Sections 206 and 270 Block 13 H&GN Survey - I’ve been receiving bonus offers, but they are not as high as Section 265 Block H&GN Should I wait

until the bonus offers go up before I accept?

Clint - many thanks! The permits dated for last year make sense - Energen contacted use about a well last summer and then said they were pushing back plans for this year. Hoping they want to drill soon! I appreciate the help!

You are a wealth of information, Dusty! Thanks for the footwork.

Brenda - no activity in either section right now. Clayton Williams permitted a horizontal well across the north-half of section 206 in 2014 but it wasn’t drilled. There are numerous permits and wells in all directions from these tracts, though. It’s a good area.

Your legal description can only have one block number. Do you mean Lot #9?

Apologies if I’m posting on an incorrect thread. I’ve been a lurker for a little while but this is my first post/question. My family has property in reeves county - section 36, block 2. We have a current lease with Energen and they have proposed but stalled on the possibility of another well. I’ve received numerous unsolicited offers for buying my minerals outright or even just a percentage…curious if this means more permits coming or if this is just a standard thing. Anyone that can point me in the right direction as far as research on permits or activity in this area would be much appreciated. Thanks! Jennifer