Some unleased, some leased

General Mineral Rights Discussion
1

PR0007129919_0001.pdf (504.7 KB)

I own an undivided interest in Tract 160-28 as shown on the attached plat of a proposed allocation unit.

My interest was leased in 1978 and has been producing continuously since and is held by production. It is currently part of the C.I. Bell GU.

A new operator (R. Lacy) is proposing to drill several horizontal wells which will be allocation wells and which will incorporate the C.I. Bell Unit.

My question is, apparently some of the other owners in Tract 160-28 are unleased. So would I get paid royalties from the new wells or would I be excluded because the operator is proposing a no-perf zone adjacent to Tract 160-28?

2

This is in Panola County, Texas.

3

This topic was automatically closed after 90 days. New replies are no longer allowed.